There is a show called Lie to Me (2009), featuring Tim Roth, a consummate British actor who played the villain in Rob Roy (1997) opposite Liam Neeson.
This extremely talented actor also stars in Tin Star (2017), a Canadian TV series set in mighty Alberta during one of its latest oil booms.
In Lie to Me, this gent plays a profiler whose singular talent of spotting a liar lands him a series of gigs with U.S. law enforcement.
The reason I’m prefacing my foray into today’s topic thusly is the notion that everybody lies.
This prefaced or provided the pretext for my train of thought: Artemis II mission around the Moon.
This may come as a shock but I do not believe people stepped on the Moon. I am convinced we sent probes, and have been sending them from the 60s, including robots, machines, gadgets and gizmos. These devices have left a lot of gear behind including unmanned scientific research stations like the laser mirror that can be targeted from Earth and whose feedback can be captured and measured down here.
All this we cannot deny. It’s up there and works.
But when it comes to actual people on the Moon, I think we never landed on it. That is to say no humans ever touched down on Luna. That is not to say that one day, technology won’t put a man and a woman on our natural satellite.
But so far we haven’t been able to pull it off.
Everything we were told and shown was a lie contrived by all the powers that be which were involved in the space race and perpetrated on a hapless global public who would not have put up with rising taxation and social-economic iniquities otherwise for close on 80 years now.
Fact is that the presence of the Van Allen radiation belts circumscribe our movements to within 640 to 58,000 km from sea level.
If we were to go through it, the aluminum foil plated shuttles would receive an amount of radiation 1,000 X more than normal. Each and every time we crossed it.
Human Radiation Exposure: Survivable vs. Dangerous
| Generally Survivable (100 rad = 1 Sv) | Dangerous / Potentially Fatal (1,000 rad = 10 Sv) |
|---|---|
| < 100 mSv (0.1 Sv): No immediate symptoms expected. Any increased cancer risk is small and difficult to detect. [cdc.gov] | ≥ 1 Sv (1,000 mSv): Lowest range where acute radiation syndrome (radiation sickness) may occur. [cdc.gov], [cdc.gov] |
| 100-500 mSv (0.1-0.5 Sv): Usually survivable; temporary changes in blood chemistry may occur. [cdc.gov] | ~0.7-10 Sv: Bone marrow syndrome develops. Risk of infection, bleeding, and death rises with dose. [cdc.gov], [CDC Radiat…et for …] |
| 500-1,000 mSv (0.5-1 Sv): Blood cell damage likely, but most healthy people survive with proper care. [cdc.gov] | ~4 Sv (4,000 mSv): Approximately 50% lethality without advanced medical treatment. [cdc.gov], [energy.gov] |
| 1-2 Sv: Many people survive, but symptoms such as nausea, fatigue, and immune suppression become more likely. [cdc.gov], [cdc.gov] | ~6-10 Sv: Severe gastrointestinal damage. Survival becomes unlikely even with intensive care. [stacks.cdc.gov], [CDC Radiat…et for …] |
| 2-3 Sv: Serious radiation sickness, but a significant fraction of people can survive with treatment. [cdc.gov] | >10 Sv: Severe GI syndrome; survival is extremely unlikely. [stacks.cdc.gov], [CDC Radiat…et for …] |
| 3-4 Sv: Critical medical emergency, but survival is possible with aggressive treatment. [cdc.gov] | >50 Sv: Neurovascular syndrome. Loss of consciousness, severe neurological damage, death within days. [en.wikipedia.org] |
| ~10 Sv and above: Near-certain death; ~10,000 mSv (10 Sv) is considered essentially 100% lethal. [cdc.gov] |
A 1963 study by T. Foelsche, designated “Estimates of radiation doses in space on the basis of current data”, maintained that a shielding of 25g/cm2 would reduce the dose rate from 20 rad/hour to 5 rad/hour, which according to him, would render a short flight-time of 2 hours through the Van Allen’s belts safe.
The author however specified that staying within the maximum depth of the inner belt for two days would subject the human body to 200 rads, which was considered an acceptable risk in the 60s but doesn’t cut it nowadays. Research is like Damocles’ sword: you never know when the thread will break.
The same study noted that in 1956, extreme solar cosmic rays events or proton showers of high intensity occurred, when the shielding of 25g/cm2 was bombarded by 50 rad. Disturbingly enough, Foelsche found that the surface of the body and the interior of a lightly shielded space vehicle or space suit, this dosage can reach 1,000 rad and more.
Now I don’t know about you folks, but I am not even worried (although we ought to worry) about the 1,000 rad threshold. No. Instead I am very concerned with that qualifier “and more“.
Space travel beyond an altitude of 640 km is hazardous to human life. In fact, there is a reason they put the International Space Station in a variable orbit oscillating between 370 and 460 km altitude. Given the atmospheric drag requiring periodic orbital reboosts and liquid rocket fuel supply runs, it would have been much more sensible to place it on a higher orbit. But doing that would have placed straight in the inner Van Allen belt, which would have brought everybody down, literally and pardon my pun.
Next time you feel inclined to agree with the official narrative, look at all the data. You will soon gather enough evidence allowing you to call BS on a lot of things people take for granted, although they should know better, but don’t.
Moving on… literally.
That is not to say that once we passed into intra-solar space, say on our way to the Moon, we’d be safe from solar and cosmic radiation.
Assuming we crossed the Van Allen belts, which we haven’t in the 1960s, and have strong doubts we did in 2026, but assuming we have, how did the cosmonauts deal with navigating inside the intra-solar space? Just asking because according to NASA, there are quite a few sources of energetic ionizing particles moving through the interplanetary space within our solar system.
Galactic Cosmic Rays: high-energy protons and heavy ions from outside the solar system. You know, the kind that give out the constant background radiation you can see on your TV set.
Solar Particle Events: sudden, intense bursts of high-energy protons and ions erupting from the Sun during solar flares or coronal mass ejections.
Solar Wind: do refrain from making fart jokes, please. Although, the Sun projects a continuous stream of lower-energy protons and electrons, just like your bean-fed cousin Bubba. 🙂
All these rays damage your DNA in real time, causing cancer, degenerative organ diseases, and central nervous system issues. Short-term prospects include acute sickness, such as acute radiation syndrome, accompanied by severe nausea and fatigue. To add insult to grave injury, your spacecraft is equally fucked, because the rays penetrate the metal hulls, degrade solar panels, and cause electronic malfunctions.
So, you tell me, folks, at which point you stop believing the official narrative and start understanding that the multiple real ways space travel hazards make landing a man on the Moon impossible?
And up there you don’t have the magnetosphere and ozone layer of the Earth to protect you. Up there or better said out there, you’re on your own, Buster.
Far from it.
Going outside the double layered shield provided by our planet’s atmosphere and magnetic field, exposes us to many types of radiation, some of which have not even been discovered yet.
Second reason we haven’t gone to the Moon between 1969-1972, is the fact that for 54 years we decided to stop visiting it.
The powers that be blamed this on high costs, lack of necessity, and even to the weird and childishly idiotic mantra that “we forgot how to send people to the Moon.”
In other words, people, we are supposed to believe that we put Man on the Moon using pen and paper and analog computing power.
But somehow the advent of silicon chip based CPUs and modern computing power rendered us unable to return to the Moon.
This is beyond risible. It’s an outrage that someone could imagine such a transparent lie and that its intended recipients, us, would swallow it whole.
I kid you not, people. They’re not even pretending to care about the quality of their BS. They must think we’re all cretinous morons.
- Finally, let’s say we’d gone to the Moon in 1969.
- And assume that afterwards we decided to stop funding manned missions because we thought they were a waste of money. But since government still needed $1 trillion of tax dollars to pay for Pentagon’s toys every year, they took the space research money and funneled it into the pockets of Big Arms manufacturers.
- If you ask yourself, how come the Soviets and Chinese and Indians went along with the US Government hoax, the answer is simple. It served their own military-industrial complexes’ agendas. Without a race to the Moon, there’d have been less incentive for the downtrodden masses to keep showing up at work and dishing out their hard-earned cash via taxes. Much less. You cannot drive the people like a slave-driver without having a superior motive justifying generational sacrifice, people! You just can’t.
- Fast forward to 2026. NASA decides to send four astronauts in Artemis II to do a figure eight loop around the Earth and the Moon, just for kicks, and without landing on it.
Are we supposed to think that it is technically impossible to actually land on Luna in 2026?!
Then why did the US taxpayers pay for all those missions and gadgets NASA approved for 60 years, if by 2026 they couldn’t even put people back on the Moon?!
I mean, if they did it in the 60s and 70s, why couldn’t they do it now?
And no, technology, $, lack of need, don’t cut it. Not now. Not any more.
I for one believe that faking the landing, by losing the original footage of the July 1969 ‘historical’ moonwalk, and the entire orchestrated PR campaign, was entirely possible given the state of video special effects available at the time.
Nowadays, one can detect any attempt at faking a moon landing or a moon walk.
That is to say, I await the first images captured by the crew of Artemis II during their flyby, with bated breath.
I’m certain, however, they will rise to the occasion and pass by Luna at a distance commensurate with a rather decent amount of haziness which would make resolving any details such as the US flag left on the Moon, or the laser mirror bouncing signals from Luna, a nebulous affair.
You see, my mother who, God rest her soul, was a consummate liar, told me without teaching me though, that in order to make a lie stick, one must intermix it with a very good helping of naked truth.
That some of us become quite adept and prolific at this, rests on their mastering this art of building their lives on the foundation of deceit and lies that feeds off of half-truths and full-lies.
It goes without saying that most if not all of us who live on Earth as a direct consequence of having adapted to this state of things.
Fact is that we are likely to believe the lies of the powers that be because we are ourselves living a lie every day that we continue to believe our own individual BS.
Living in this day and age has made us all susceptible to government propaganda. We no longer think rationally, because doing so would threaten the status-quo of the Lie. As a great Polish philosopher living under Communism put it:
A clever, liberal, and merry individual is a good sport; a more farsighted person predicting dire results becomes a wet-blanket killjoy.”
Andrew Lobaczewski
The man observed naked human nature, finding a disturbing trend impacting society every step of the way. People do not want to have uncomfortable conversations anymore. He said and I quote “It is better to think about easier and more pleasant things.” Which also explains why people naturally eliminate all the facts and data that would force them out of their comfort zone. In time, this becomes a habit, and turns into a custom accepted by society at large.
It is at this point, the populace accepts that inconvenient truth should be left unsaid.
We become incapable to come to the correct conclusions.
And that makes it a child’s play for others to pull the wool over our foolish eyes.
We should always remember that we all lie almost all of the time.
Remember this when you next feel the need to bitch about the cost of fuel or how hard it is to get ahead in life.
And guess what if you and I do it, then the government and corporations do it on a much grander scale.
It is by constantly arguing and debating with yourself and others that you stand a small chance of scratching at the surface of Truth. Otherwise, “you lose the capacity got psychological reason and moral criticism.”
And that is how we end up believing any lie they keep repeating to us over and over again.
Götterdämmerung 