They are all a sham.
Quantum computers, to put it in layman’s terms, are normal computers processing bits of information coded as “1” and “0” that some people one day decided to build using language masking the lack of innovation by adding words like “quantum” and “qubits”.
There is nothing intrinsically new, innovative, ground-breaking or even special about quantum computers. They are not using a new type of applied physics. They are using nuclear physics, which BTW, everything is composed of, and hence uses.
Furthermore, its underlying operating design principles controlling it dictate that a limited set of basic elements (qubits) are manipulated by a simple set of rules – rotations of the vector that represents the quantum state. Observing the system during the manipulations is flawed: if you look too soon, the computation will fail. That’s because you’ve reached its constraining limit: you are not allowed to peak at the results before the machine reaches its final state.
Consider Schrodinger’s Cat and his proverbial box:
The cat is both alive and dead, depending on the observer. If the observer doesn’t peak inside the box, the cat is & isn’t. It is only by looking that the observer will determine, as the photons connecting the mirror of his eyes to the target (cat’s position in a box) hit it, it is only then that the quantum uncertainty is resolved.
I am sorry, folks, but I need my computers a little less esoteric, and more pragmatic. We can only know what we can detect using our instrumentation. If we go into what if territory, in fact, it is because we went deep into what if territory that we find ourselves here and now, debating if quantum computers exist or not.
String theory, parallel universes, multiverses, and all that are unproven, unsubstantiated, undocumented hypotheses lacking the mathematical, physical, or chemical foundations that have grounded and anchored all previous physics into REALITY.
They are therefore THEORETICAL, which is to say outside PRACTICAL APPLIED PHYSICS, which is to say physics has peaked with Einstein. Everything else, including Feynman’s work is theoretical.
Let’s face it, people. We have been pulling the cat’s tail for the last 50-60 years by going down a rabbit’s hole that is as nonsensical as it is obscure.
Next time you hear someone prance about parallel universes or the multiverse, ask them if they’ve visited or are coming back and bringing friends along. See what they say!
As for the vaccine racket and sham, oh boyo, where do I start?
Marc Menant and his seminal The Troubling History of Vaccines (L’Inquiétante histoire des vaccins)
Let’s start with the very man.
Well, let me put it this way. Forget all you know about vaccines and immunization.
Almost everything is if not downright contrived, well, I’ll say this, most of what you know was highly embellished. And why? Because government has always wanted to look like they knew what they were doing.
But you know something, let me give you a leg up. I shall summarize everything the man says.
- The Plague: Yersinia pestis or the Black Death that killed between a third and half of the world’s population at times, has now but virtually disappeared. In 1897, Haffkine made an inactivated bacterial vaccine, that was deployed at the beginning of the 20th century in India. Thing is, as the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group study (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6532692/) will show, “there is not enough evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of any plague vaccine, or the relative effectiveness between vaccines and their tolerability. Circumstantial data from observational studies suggest that killed types may be more effective and have fewer adverse effects than attenuated types of vaccine. No evidence appears to exist on the long‐term effects of any plague vaccine.” Conclusion: the plague was not defeated by vaccines but by improvements in mass hygiene, better sanitation and sewage treatment. In short, modernity bested the Black Death, not vaccines.
- Tuberculosis (TB): Dr. Menant claims, and I have to agree with him, that consumption was not eradicated by the invention and use of TB vaccines. I do believe that TB was a disease that afflicted the modern industrial world of the late 18th and 19th centuries, which created the conditions for its propagation (misery, coal pollution, unsanitary conditions, overpopulation). Consumption virtually disappeared in the 20th century, once sanitary energy solutions like hydro power, sanitary housing, rising wages, did away with its main drivers. Who, now, gets TB? Almost nobody. And how many people are still immunized against TB?
- Covid-19: Does anyone remember how the powers that be, governments and Big Pharma, were telling people that the Vaccine was going to protect us against the ravages of Covid-19? And how we will be safe from contagion? And how the narrative somehow morphed as 2020 become 2021 and it became 2022, into a story of mitigating Covid-19’s deleterious effects? And people, amazingly, bought it: hook, line, and sinker. Because if people are scarred enough, you can get them to buy into any BS story.
You see, folks, we are at a crossroads. Before us, there are two options:
A. We continue to buy into government stories and follow their instructions to our peril
or
B. We don’t.
But beware, when they’re going to notice, and they sure will, they won’t like it.
Götterdämmerung 